CNN’s John Sutton has written a really great article describing sensor networks — and how they’re radically altering the way older patients lead their lives.  John describes how sensor networks — installed in mattresses or on doors, refrigerators, etc. — are being used to monitor motion and vital signs, and to look for breaks in people’s normal routines.  And these networks are linked to the Internet, so they can alert friends, family members, and doctors anytime something seems awry.

It’s a terrific exposé about how far we’ve come in an area of health IT research…

The sensors know when Charlton Hall Jr. wakes up to go to the bathroom. They know how much time he spends in bed. They watch him do jigsaw puzzles in the den. They tattle when he opens the refrigerator.

Sound like a Big Brother nightmare?

Not for Hall. The 74-year-old finds comfort in monitored living.

“It’s a wonderful system for helping older people to stay independent as long as possible,” he said, sitting in the living room of his 7,500-square-foot house, a sensor watching him from an elaborate bookshelf. “They know where I am — all the time.”

The systems — which can monitor a host of things, from motion in particular rooms to whether a person has taken his or her medicine — collect information about a person’s daily habits and condition, and then relay that in real-time to doctors or family members.

If Hall opens an exterior door at night, for example, an alert goes out to his doctor, a monitoring company and two of his closest friends, since he doesn’t have family nearby.

“They want to know if I’ve fallen, and where I am,” he said, noting that he’s fallen several times in recent years and also has a chronic heart condition and diabetes.

…but also illustrative of more we have yet to do…

Bob Jennings’ dad, Robert Jennings, now 86, didn’t take to the idea kindly.

“I don’t need that damn thing,” Bob Jennings recalls his dad saying.

But if it meant he could stay in his house, he would agree to it.

The younger Jennings said the system has proven useful…

But it’s not clear Robert Jennings understands the system.

Check out the full article here:  http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/11/19/sensors.aging/.

(Contributed by Erwin Gianchandani, CCC Director)

To Facebook message or to e-mail? Facebook message.

At least that was the conclusion of a report from Nielsen Online published earlier this year, which found that, through 2008, people spent more time on social networking websites than they did in their e-mail accounts.  While the revelation wasn’t too surprising, it was an important milestone in the history of the Internet.  Add to that a Sheraton Hotels survey this week, which reported that 60% of us use social media — not cell phones or e-mail — to communicate with loved ones when we’re traveling, and it’s clear that the Facebooks and Twitters of the world are here to stay.

In light of this increasing prevalence of social media, this month’s IEEE Computer is very timely.  In a special issue titled Technology-Mediated Social Participation (or TMSP for short), guest editors Peter Pirolli (Palo Alto Research Center), Jenny Preece (University of Maryland), and Ben Shneiderman (University of Maryland) — working with teams of prominent colleagues — lay out a roadmap for long-term R&D, education, and policy, describing the key questions and challenges for building upon existing tools to foster even wider, more in-depth social participation, address national priorities, and, perhaps most importantly, mitigate the potential dangers associated with these technologies.

Calling for a “National Initiative in Social Participation,” Peter, Jenny, and Ben describe the “deep science questions with profound theoretical impacts on human use of technologies.  Computer science challenges include scalable network analysis algorithms, effective visualizations that guide moderator decisions and community organizer activities, and universal usability to support diverse users and platforms. … Data-driven visual analytics would enable tracking and ranking evolving networks, agent-based simulations, and searching for distinctive and common features in large networks.”  They go on to highlight the “strong research opportunities” in areas like collective intelligence, collective action, social creativity, social dilemmas, as well as around basic principles such as privacy, freedom, and identity — all of which influence design decisions and social participation.

Among the areas of national significance for TMSP:  open government; health 2.0; education; traditional media (i.e., TV newscasts and newspapers) literacy; and person-to-person diplomacy.

The IEEE Computer special issue is the result of a pair of workshops in December 2009 and April 2010 funded by the National Science Foundation — an activity, the trio point out, that itself emerged from the grassroots efforts of academic, industrial, and government participants.

I encourage you to check out the entire issue.

Update 11/7/2010: Ben Shneiderman and Jenny Preece will be speakers at a December 1 New America Foundation event in Washington, DC:  Technology, Social Innovation, and Civic Participation:  What’s the Next Step? The session — Wednesday, Dec. 1, 3:30-4:45pm, at the New America Foundation at 19th & L Streets, NW — is open to the public; register here today!

(Contributed by Erwin Gianchandani, CCC Director)