Subscribe in a reader

• Subscribe to this Blog

  Your email:
  

   

• Recent Posts

  • CIFellows Status Report
  • “Computing Research that Changed the World” - VIDEOS!
  • NSF Alan T. Waterman Award
  • CCC, CRA Launch New “CIFellows” Opportunity for New PhDs
  • “Unleashing Waves of Innovation”
  • Library of Congress symposium slides are up!
  • More on “Computing Research that Changed the World”
  • My Day at the Library of Congress

• 4D immersive holographic spaces big data broadband CCC Council CIFellows Clean Slate Computing Innovation Fellows CRA disc distributed computing education enrollments essays funding GENI highlights initiatives Internet Library of Congress MapReduce Markoff multicore multicore parallel NetSE Network Science nominations parallel parallelism parallel multicore pipeline policy postdocs privacy robotics security Snowbird SQL workshop reports big science (2)
  CIFellows (1)
  computer history (1)
  pipeline (2)
  policy (5)
  research horizons (17)
  resources (8)
  Uncategorized (12)
  workshop reports (6)
  

  WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.

• Archives

  Select Month June 2009  (2) May 2009  (2) April 2009  (2) March 2009  (4) February 2009  (6) January 2009  (1) December 2008  (2) November 2008  (4) October 2008  (4) September 2008  (2) August 2008  (1) July 2008  (4) June 2008  (2) May 2008  (1) April 2008  (1)

• Blogroll

  • All Things Distributed
  • Computing Research Policy Blog
  • CSDiary
  • Data Beta
  • Reed’s Ruminations
• Search for:

• Administrative Links:

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

• Enabled by

  
  
  
  
  
  
  

The CCC-sponsored robotics initiative kicks off next week with the first of four workshops covering the impact, applications and emerging technologies of robotics.

Robotics research and development have already transformed our lives in many ways: they perform nearly all the welding and painting on the cars we drive; they enable telerobotic surgery resulting in more reliable outcomes and faster recovery times; they perform millions of scientific experiments and observations in chemistry, biology and medical labs.  Increasingly robotics is also providing improved control and functionality in people’s daily lives: some new model cars can park themselves or provide advanced distance-keeping cruise control and collision warnings; millions of autonomous vacuum cleaners are in use in homes across the country; educational toys that move and sense are becoming increasingly popular.

With even larger future impact on the way in elder-care, environmental work and professional services, the international competition for leadership in robotics is significant.  Already, Europe, Japan, and other countries have organized strong, coherent, and well-funded robotics research and development initiatives.  The U.S. must also develop strategic and coordinated support for our robotics research community.

In addition to organizing a set of workshops, Henrik Christensen and his colleagues are leading the creation of a National Robotics Leadership Council to provide an ongoing organization for robotics advocacy and leadership.  The two early meetings will coincide with a caucus on robotics being organized by Congress for June 18.

This attention to connecting with governmental and industrial sponsors is exemplary of what the CCC should be enabling.  The physics research community is well known for its effective governmental lobbying; computer science needs to do a better job of building such connections.  While good scientific ideas must of course form the bedrock of our work, in these times, the focus of our argument must be economic—return on investment—a basis on which I think CS can make a very good case.

In my view, no one in the CS research community will see the CCC as a hero for “defining a research agenda”—these things are usually best developed bottom-up, (and besides there already exist many venues for workshops that are research-focused).  The CCC will be a hero if we can help increase funding for CS.  This will involve creative CS researchers coming together with government and industrial leaders, and developing the right scientific and economic arguments to make the case.

I applaud the National Robotics Leadership Council.  I think they are a good example to us all.

Their workshops, topics and dates are:

• Robotics in Manufacturing and Automation (June 17, DC)
  Organizers: K. Goldberg, V. Kumar, J. Trinkle, H. I. Christensen
• Healthcare and Medical Robotics (June 19-20, DC)
  Organizers: A. Okamura, M. Mataric & H. I. Christensen
• Domestic and Professional Service Robotics (August 7-8, San Francisco)
  Organizers: B. Thomasmeyer, O. Brock, H. Christensen
• Emerging Technologies and Trends (August 14-15, Snowbird, UT)
  Organizers: M. Mason, J. Hollerbach, H. I. Christensen

For more information about these efforts and how to participate see http://www.us-robotics.us/.

Comments