Computing Community Consortium Blog

The goal of the Computing Community Consortium (CCC) is to catalyze the computing research community to debate longer range, more audacious research challenges; to build consensus around research visions; to evolve the most promising visions toward clearly defined initiatives; and to work with the funding organizations to move challenges and visions toward funding initiatives. The purpose of this blog is to provide a more immediate, online mechanism for dissemination of visioning concepts and community discussion/debate about them.

An Alternative to Science Funding?

July 13th, 2011 / in Research News / by Erwin Gianchandani

Crowds are common at rock concerts, basketball games, and scientific research proposals. Wait — what? In The New York Times this week, there’s an interesting story about scientists looking for funding in creative ways:

As research budgets tighten at universities and federal financing agencies, a new crop of Web-savvy scientists is hoping the wisdom — and generosity — of the crowds will come to the rescue. While nonprofit science organizations and medical research centers commonly seek donations from the public, Dr. [Jennifer] Calkins, an adjunct professor of biology at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash., and Dr. [Jennifer] Gee may have been the first professional scientists to use a generic “crowd funding” Web site to underwrite basic research.


In May 2010, neither had the principal investigator status required to apply through their institutions for a National Science Foundation grant. But they were eager to begin collecting data about the behavior, appearance, distribution, habitat selection and phylogenic position of the least-studied quail species in the Callipepla genus.


Dr. Calkins, who has published research papers and poetry, turned to the community of artists and microphilanthropists at Her plea to potential backers on the site: “By contributing to this project you will support a study of this little known species as we examine its behavior and evolution in its natural habitat, a space encroached upon by both urban sprawl and tension surrounding narcotics trafficking.”


Web sites like Kickstarter, IndieGoGo and RocketHub are an increasingly popular way to bankroll creative projects — usually in film, music and visual arts. It is not very likely that anyone imagined they would be used to finance scientific research. And it is unclear what problems this odd pairing might beget.

The article goes on to discuss Dr. Andrea Gaggioli’s project for peer-reviewed crowdsource-funded science, and crowdsourcing in Cancer Research UK.

Not to get overeager, it’s clear not all science funding can work this way:

It’s too soon to tell how widespread science crowd funding will become. Would a geology project on organic sedimentary rocks, for example, open as many wallets as the charismatic quail?

But this kind of approach might be suitable for those projects that need a little bit of funding to get going:

The success of the Calkins-Gee quail project inspired Alison Styring, a member of Evergreen’s environmental studies faculty, to submit a Kickstarter proposal titled “Mapping the Bornean Soundscape.”


“It’s getting harder and harder to get funding,” said Dr. Styring, who hopes to raise $15,000 to record the sounds of Tawau Hills Park in Malaysian Borneo and study birds there.


Saddled with a busy teaching schedule, Dr. Styring was writing student evaluations in January when the last National Science Foundation grant deadline came and went. Relatively low-cost field projects like hers, she said, are not typically financed by the foundation. But Dr. Styring was not sure if crowd funding would work for her or what rewards to offer as an incentive to potential donors. “Maybe musicians could use the sounds,” she said.

Click through to read the full story.

(Contributed by Max ChoEben Tisdale Fellow, CRA)

An Alternative to Science Funding?


  1. This was a seriously amazing article. And I’m thinking – can’t we just crowdsource funding for the James Webb Space Telescope? I’m sure lots of Silicon Valley millionaires are upset at its possible loss. Sure they didn’t pay for the quail project, but the JWST thing has gotten far more media attention

  2. The general public awareness about the significance of scientific research may not be quite there. And for crowdfunding to be significant, numbers do matter. An idea to be successful in gaining significant amount of crowdfunding, it needs to have an aura of certain “coolness” about it, at least for many people (numbers game again). In other words, it must be something after contributing to which you can brag about it with your friends and sound really cool!

  3. Jason Keeley says:

    I love these new ways of supporting science. SciFund Challenge is a great idea. is another.